Gonzaga, Grams. C., Haselton, M. Grams., Smurda, J., Davies, Yards. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Evolution and you can Person Decisions, 29(2), 119–126.
Cross-sectional investigation off closeness, interests, and you may union: Review new assumptions of the triangular theory away from like
Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. Yards. (2000). The spot of accessory during the people mating. Post on General Mindset, 4(2), 186–204.
Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A. (2002). Internet sites contradiction revisited. Diary off Public Products, 58(1), 49–74.
Kraut, Roentgen., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet contradiction: A social technical you to reduces personal wedding and you may mental well-becoming? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.
Kreider, R.Yards., & Areas, J. M. (2001). Count, time, and you will time of marriage ceremonies and you may divorces. Most recent People Records, 70-80, (Arizona, DC: You.S. Census Agency, 2005).
Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, E. (2004). Impact most readily useful from the creating even worse: Social evaluations in this personal relationship. Record out-of Identification and you may Social Therapy, 87(1), 80–95.
Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. An effective., & Gailliot, M. T. (2009). Diary off Identity and farmers dating site Reddit you will Personal Mindset, 97(1), 74–87.
Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. An effective., & Gonzaga, Grams. C. (2008). Automatic inattention so you can glamorous solutions: The fresh new changed psychology off dating fix. Evolution and you can Individual Conclusion, 29(5), 343–349.
pold, B. E. (1981). Sequential study away from conflict and you may agreement into the upset and you can nondistressed marital lovers. Journal away from Asking and Medical Psychology, 49(4), 554–567.
McKenna, K. Y. A beneficial., Eco-friendly, A great. S., Gleason, Yards. J. (2002). Relationship creation on line: What’s the huge destination? Record of Personal Circumstances, 58(1), 9–31.
Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Griffin, D. W. (1996). The key benefits of positive illusions: Idealization in addition to structure of pleasure in the romantic dating. Journal out-of Identity and you can Personal Psychology, 70(1), 79–98.
Neff, L. An effective., & Karney, B. Roentgen. (2002). Self-research aim within the intimate matchmaking: A style of globally improvement and you will specific confirmation. When you look at the P. Noller & J. A. Feeney (Eds.), Information ents from the study of couple telecommunications (pp. 32–58). Ny, NY: Cambridge University Push.
Intrasexual vigilance: The latest implicit cognition out-of close competition
Obegi, J. H. (2008). The development of the consumer-counselor bond from lens out-of accessory principle. Psychotherapy: Principle, Research, Practice, Degree, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330
Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). This new societal overseeing system: Increased sensitivity so you can public signs due to the fact an adaptive response to social exemption. From inside the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), This new public outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, getting rejected, and you will intimidation (pp. 213–226). Ny, NY: Mindset Press.
Enter, T., & Lydon, J. E. (2001). Around the globe and particular relational activities on the connection with social affairs. Log off Identification and you may Public Psychology, 80(4), 613–631.
Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. A beneficial., Tran, S., ). Connection and you will suggestions trying to in close dating. Identity and Societal Mindset Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.
Ross, L. Roentgen., & Spinner, B. (2001). General and you can certain accessory representations during the adulthood: Is there a romance?. Journal Out-of Societal And private Relationship, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001
Rusbult, C. Age., Olsen, Letter., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. Good. (2001)mitment and you will matchmaking fix components. During the J. Harvey & An effective. Wenzel (Eds.), Close intimate relationship: Fix and you can enhancement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schul, Y., & Vinokur, An effective. D. (2000). Projection truly impact among spouses as a function of the similarity within shared event. Identification And you may Social Therapy Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008
Seligman, C., Fazio, R. H., & Zanna, M. P. (1980). Effects of salience off extrinsic rewards with the taste and you can loving. Record out-of Identity and Personal Mindset, 38(3), 453–460.