3. Abilities
Dining table step one depicts this new frequency of each of one’s risks of the research, with respect to the standard of severity located. As well, they shows this new comparisons amongst the withdrawals away from girls and boys into various other risks. Complete, the players exactly who shown nothing wrong ranged ranging from % who had no troubles with challenging Websites play with or more so you’re able to 83.4% who’d no problems that have on the web grooming. We note that the variety of reasonable and you can really serious trouble varied between cuatro% for sexting and you may 17% to own problematic Web sites have fun with. 9% away from reasonable/significant dilemmas plus in cyberbullying, it achieved thirteen.7%. The newest frequencies based in the various other degrees of trouble had been always higher for girls compared to boys.
Table step one
Prevalence of each of your own dangers as a function of the fresh new severity of your own condition towards the full test as well as intercourse.
In this regard, significant differences were also found between boys and girls in the mean total scores of cyberbullying victimization (Welch’s t = ?2.02, p < 0.043, d = 0.07), online grooming (Welch's t = ?3.51, p < 0.001, d = 0.12) and problematic Internet use (Welch's t = ?2.07, p < 0.039, d = 0.07). In these cases, the mean scores were higher for girls than for boys. There were no significant differences in the rest of the risks: cyber dating abuse victimization (Welch's t = ?1.9, p < 0.058, d = 0.12) and sexting (Welch's t = 0.94, p < 0.410, d = 0.03).
Regarding the type of school (private and public), significant differences were only found in the risks of online grooming (t = ?3.37, p < 0.001, d = 0.13) and sexting (t = 3.8, p < 0.001, d = 0.15). The mean scores were higher in public schools than in private schools in both cases.
In terms of the educational stage (1st–2nd grade of CSE, 3rd–4th grade of CSE and Post-secondary Education), statistically significant differences were found for the risks of cyberbullying victimization (p < 0.002), online grooming (p < 0.001), sexting (p < 0.001) and problematic Internet use (p < 0.001). The scores were higher in 3rd–4th grades, except for online grooming victimization, where higher scores were found in Post-secondary Education (see Desk dos ).
Table 2
Variations given that a purpose of informative stage (1st–second, 3rd–fourth grades regarding CSE and you will Blog post-supplementary Knowledge) from the risks (n = 3212, apart from the way it is out-of cyber relationship punishment having n = 1061).
Note: Meters = arithmetic imply; SD = simple departure, F = Welch’s-F, p = significance; ? 2 = eta squared.
Dining table step 3 shows the fresh new correlations within certain threats. Them had confident and you will significant correlations collectively, into matchmaking ranging from cyberbullying victimization and you may cyber dating victimization position aside. Websites risks which have a sexual parts (online grooming and you may sexting) was basically extremely correlated. Generally, this new correlations was basically higher to own boys in the most common of the dangers, with the exception of the latest relationships ranging from cyber matchmaking victimization and you will brushing and you will ranging from problematic Web sites have fun with and you can cyberbullying victimization, on the internet grooming and you will sexting.
Dining table step 3
Note: The correlations for boys are shown below the diagonal and for girls above it. All correlations are significant at p < 0.001. M = arithmetic mean; SD = standard deviation.
Desk 4 presents new comorbidities one of several some Web sites dangers relevant in order to individual communications (cyberbullying victimization oasis dating reddit, cyber dating punishment victimization, sexting an internet-based grooming). Precisely the members exactly who accomplished all the items concerning risks related in order to victimization (letter = 1109) was indeed sensed (i.age., eliminating about analysis people that didn’t come with lover). Of your own leftover players, sixty.7% exhibited one of the analysed dangers (letter = 674). The risk on higher private incidence is cyberbullying victimization (%), accompanied by on the web grooming. The most frequent several-risk combinations had been cyberbullying victimization-on line grooming and you can cyberbullying-sexting. We high light the three-chance blend of cyberbullying-sexting-grooming victimization. Finally, 5.49% of victimized adolescents exhibited most of the risks conjointly.